Original research
Average electricity bill by state, and why it is not the same question as the rate
Residential revenue divided by residential accounts, for every US jurisdiction, from the mandatory annual census of American electric utilities.
Written by HyreSolar Research team Research and analysis
Audited by HyreSolar Research team Data audit and fact check
The headline
What "average electricity bill" means on this page
The phrase average electricity bill is used to mean at least four different things in published sources, and the differences between them are larger than the differences between many states. Here is exactly what ours is.
- Average monthly bill
- Total residential electricity revenue ÷ total residential customer accounts ÷ 12, computed within each state from Form EIA-861 for the 2024 data year. The national figure is $142.26.
- An arithmetic mean, not a typical household
- Every account carries equal weight in the denominator: a studio flat and a five-bedroom house with a pool count once each. The mean sits above the median in a right-skewed distribution, so more than half of households pay less than this figure. EIA-861 reports no distribution, so we cannot tell you how much less.
- Includes fixed charges
- Revenue is everything the utility billed for residential service: energy charges, the monthly customer or service charge, demand and delivery components, riders and surcharges. A household that used nothing all year still contributes its standing charge to the numerator, which is why no per-kWh rate multiplied by any consumption figure will reproduce an individual bill.
- Residential class only
- Commercial, industrial and transport sales are excluded from both the numerator and the denominator. A state with heavy industry does not get a higher household bill for it.
- One account is not one home
- A master-metered apartment building is a single residential account serving many households. Where that stock is large the average bill is overstated relative to what a family actually pays, and the effect is not uniform between states.
A bill is two numbers multiplied together, and they disagree
Every electricity bill in this dataset satisfies the same identity: bill = price × consumption ÷ 12. Take a state's residential price in cents per kilowatt-hour, multiply by the kilowatt-hours its average household buys in a year, convert to dollars, divide by twelve. That is not a model of the bill. It is the bill, rearranged, and it reproduces every published figure in the table below to within 5.3 cents a month, which is the rounding carried in the price and consumption columns and nothing else.
The identity is trivial. What is not trivial is that its two terms are strongly negatively correlated across the states: r = -0.74. Expensive electricity and large consumption almost never occur in the same place. States with dear power are cool, coastal, dense and often gas-heated; states with cheap power are hot, humid, sprawling and electrically heated and cooled.
The consequence is compression. The price of electricity varies across the states by a factor of 3.72, from 11.51¢ in North Dakota to 42.86¢ in Hawaii. Household consumption varies by a factor of 2.43. But the bill, their product, varies by only 2.28, less than either of the numbers that make it. Multiplying two widely dispersed quantities normally produces something more dispersed still. Here it produces something less.
The formal version: because the identity is exact, the variance of the log bill decomposes without residual into the variance of the log price, the variance of log consumption, and twice their covariance. Those three terms are 0.0928, 0.0653 and -0.1264, and they sum to 0.0317: the observed variance of the log bill. The negative covariance cancels 80% of the dispersion the two inputs would otherwise produce.
That is why a rate comparison is such a poor guide to a bill. Across the 51 jurisdictions, price explains a moderate amount of bill variation (r = 0.60) and consumption explains almost none on its own (r = 0.06), not because consumption does not matter, but because the states that use the most are systematically the ones paying the least per unit.
Four ways to arrive at an electricity bill, and only two of them are common
Split the 51 jurisdictions at the median price (14.91¢/kWh) and the median household consumption (10,582 kWh a year) and you get four groups. 38 of 51 land on the diagonal (dear and thrifty, or cheap and hungry) and only 13 land off it. That imbalance is the negative correlation made concrete, and it is why most states' bills cluster.
Dear power, small appetite, 19 jurisdictions
The largest group, and the one the rate tables are built around: Hawaii, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, California, Pennsylvania and 13 others. Hawaii is the extreme case, 42.86¢/kWh, the dearest electricity in the country, bought at 5,938 kWh a year, the smallest household appetite in the country. It still returns the highest bill in America at $212.12, because a price that far above the field cannot be offset by any plausible thrift.
California is the more representative member: 2nd dearest at 31.97¢/kWh, but 2nd lowest on consumption at 6,039 kWh. Its bill of $160.86 ranks only 8th. Mild coastal climate, gas space heating, and four decades of appliance and building standards.
Maine makes the point most sharply of all: 8th of 51 on price (first being the dearest, a convention every rank on this page follows) and 27th on bill. A household there buys 6,601 kWh a year, about 36% below the national figure.
Cheap power, large appetite, 19 jurisdictions
The mirror image, and overwhelmingly the South: Florida, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, North Carolina and 13 others. Louisiana is the extreme, 11.73¢/kWh, 48th of 51 on price and among the cheapest in the country, on 14,422 kWh a year, the highest household consumption of any US jurisdiction.
Its bill is $140.96, only $1.30 below the national average, despite electricity costing 29% less per unit than the national price. Mississippi does the same trick and lands above the national bill at $154.83. Florida, Georgia and South Carolina all clear $150 a month on below-median rates.
Long cooling seasons, electric resistance and heat-pump heating rather than gas, larger detached housing, and a great deal of poorly insulated older stock. These states are where a rate comparison misleads worst, and the divergence table further down quantifies exactly how far.
Cheap power, small appetite, 6 jurisdictions
Where bills are genuinely low, because both terms are low: Kansas, Iowa, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico. Just 6 of 51 jurisdictions manage it.
New Mexico has the lowest average bill in America at $92.88, 14.20¢/kWh on 7,849 kWh a year. Utah is next at $94.57. These are the interior-west and northern-plains states: mild summers by southern standards, gas heating, cheap hydro, coal or wind generation, and no month in which air conditioning runs around the clock.
It is worth noticing that this group contains two of the states with the most rooftop solar per household, Utah at 6.4% and New Mexico at 6.5%. Solar adoption is not driven by the size of the bill, and this quadrant is the clearest evidence of it. Adoption by state →
Dear power, large appetite, 7 jurisdictions
The quadrant that produces the punishing bills, and it is nearly as thin as the cheap-and-thrifty one: Alabama ($173.50), Maryland ($165.87), Texas ($163.72), Arizona ($160.24), West Virginia ($154.76), Delaware ($150.87), Nevada ($139.39).
Alabama is the state most often reported the wrong way round. Its electricity costs 15.18¢/kWh (barely above the median and below the national 16.48¢) yet it carries the 3rd highest bill in America at $173.50, on 13,718 kWh a year. Texas does the same at $163.72, 6th in the country on 24th price.
Between them, the two off-diagonal quadrants hold 13 of 51 jurisdictions. The remaining 38 sit on the diagonal, where one term offsets the other, and it is that offsetting, not any regulatory harmonisation, that keeps American electricity bills as similar as they are.
Average electricity bill by state, all 51 jurisdictions, 2024
Ranked by monthly bill, highest first. The price and consumption columns are the two terms behind each bill; multiply them and divide by twelve and you get the first column back.
| # | State | Monthly bill | Annual bill | Price | Consumption | Price rank | Use rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawaii | $212.12 | $2,545 | 42.86¢ | 5,938 kWh | 1 | 51 |
| 2 | Connecticut | $199.66 | $2,396 | 28.75¢ | 8,335 kWh | 4 | 35 |
| 3 | Alabama | $173.50 | $2,082 | 15.18¢ | 13,718 kWh | 21 | 4 |
| 4 | Massachusetts | $167.20 | $2,006 | 29.35¢ | 6,836 kWh | 3 | 47 |
| 5 | Maryland | $165.87 | $1,990 | 17.86¢ | 11,146 kWh | 13 | 23 |
| 6 | Texas | $163.72 | $1,965 | 14.94¢ | 13,154 kWh | 24 | 6 |
| 7 | Rhode Island | $162.40 | $1,949 | 28.65¢ | 6,802 kWh | 5 | 48 |
| 8 | California | $160.86 | $1,930 | 31.97¢ | 6,039 kWh | 2 | 50 |
| 9 | Arizona | $160.24 | $1,923 | 14.91¢ | 12,899 kWh | 26 | 8 |
| 10 | Florida | $156.09 | $1,873 | 14.14¢ | 13,250 kWh | 33 | 5 |
| 11 | Mississippi | $154.83 | $1,858 | 13.39¢ | 13,871 kWh | 37 | 2 |
| 12 | West Virginia | $154.76 | $1,857 | 15.07¢ | 12,320 kWh | 22 | 15 |
| 13 | Georgia | $151.25 | $1,815 | 14.08¢ | 12,888 kWh | 35 | 9 |
| 14 | Delaware | $150.87 | $1,810 | 16.57¢ | 10,928 kWh | 17 | 24 |
| 15 | South Carolina | $149.51 | $1,794 | 14.23¢ | 12,605 kWh | 30 | 10 |
| 16 | Virginia | $148.77 | $1,785 | 14.41¢ | 12,388 kWh | 29 | 13 |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | $145.17 | $1,742 | 17.77¢ | 9,806 kWh | 14 | 32 |
| 18 | New Hampshire | $144.87 | $1,738 | 23.40¢ | 7,428 kWh | 9 | 42 |
| 19 | Alaska | $143.54 | $1,722 | 24.82¢ | 6,939 kWh | 6 | 44 |
| 20 | North Carolina | $143.50 | $1,722 | 14.13¢ | 12,184 kWh | 34 | 16 |
| 21 | Tennessee | $143.32 | $1,720 | 12.42¢ | 13,843 kWh | 43 | 3 |
| 22 | Louisiana | $140.96 | $1,692 | 11.73¢ | 14,422 kWh | 48 | 1 |
| 23 | New York | $139.53 | $1,674 | 24.43¢ | 6,854 kWh | 7 | 46 |
| 24 | Nevada | $139.39 | $1,673 | 15.00¢ | 11,154 kWh | 23 | 22 |
| 25 | Ohio | $135.16 | $1,622 | 15.99¢ | 10,146 kWh | 18 | 30 |
| 26 | Kentucky | $133.81 | $1,606 | 12.79¢ | 12,558 kWh | 40 | 12 |
| 27 | Maine | $133.60 | $1,603 | 24.29¢ | 6,601 kWh | 8 | 49 |
| 28 | Indiana | $133.06 | $1,597 | 14.77¢ | 10,814 kWh | 27 | 25 |
| 29 | Oklahoma | $132.05 | $1,585 | 12.24¢ | 12,949 kWh | 45 | 7 |
| 30 | Oregon | $129.62 | $1,555 | 14.70¢ | 10,582 kWh | 28 | 26 |
| 31 | Missouri | $129.18 | $1,550 | 12.91¢ | 12,007 kWh | 38 | 17 |
| 32 | Arkansas | $129.13 | $1,550 | 12.32¢ | 12,580 kWh | 44 | 11 |
| 33 | New Jersey | $128.13 | $1,538 | 19.34¢ | 7,949 kWh | 11 | 38 |
| 34 | South Dakota | $127.81 | $1,534 | 12.86¢ | 11,925 kWh | 39 | 18 |
| 35 | Vermont | $125.66 | $1,508 | 21.90¢ | 6,884 kWh | 10 | 45 |
| 36 | Kansas | $123.90 | $1,487 | 14.15¢ | 10,508 kWh | 32 | 27 |
| 37 | Michigan | $119.31 | $1,432 | 19.30¢ | 7,419 kWh | 12 | 43 |
| 38 | North Dakota | $118.38 | $1,421 | 11.51¢ | 12,344 kWh | 51 | 14 |
| 39 | Washington | $113.68 | $1,364 | 11.90¢ | 11,465 kWh | 47 | 20 |
| 40 | District of Columbia | $113.23 | $1,359 | 17.71¢ | 7,672 kWh | 15 | 41 |
| 41 | Iowa | $111.54 | $1,338 | 13.40¢ | 9,987 kWh | 36 | 31 |
| 42 | Wisconsin | $110.87 | $1,330 | 17.18¢ | 7,742 kWh | 16 | 40 |
| 43 | Nebraska | $110.28 | $1,323 | 11.53¢ | 11,477 kWh | 49 | 19 |
| 44 | Minnesota | $110.06 | $1,321 | 15.45¢ | 8,548 kWh | 20 | 34 |
| 45 | Illinois | $109.99 | $1,320 | 15.87¢ | 8,317 kWh | 19 | 36 |
| 46 | Idaho | $108.73 | $1,305 | 11.52¢ | 11,326 kWh | 50 | 21 |
| 47 | Montana | $107.91 | $1,295 | 12.66¢ | 10,226 kWh | 41 | 29 |
| 48 | Wyoming | $107.65 | $1,292 | 12.47¢ | 10,361 kWh | 42 | 28 |
| 49 | Colorado | $100.57 | $1,207 | 14.92¢ | 8,091 kWh | 25 | 37 |
| 50 | Utah | $94.57 | $1,135 | 12.22¢ | 9,290 kWh | 46 | 33 |
| 51 | New Mexico | $92.88 | $1,115 | 14.20¢ | 7,849 kWh | 31 | 39 |
HyreSolar analysis of EIA-861 2024. National average $142.26 a month, $1,707 a year, on 16.48¢/kWh and 10,359 kWh a year. Price rank and use rank both run 1 = highest.
Figures labelled HyreSolar analysis are computed by us from the EIA source files named below. EIA publishes the inputs; it does not publish these ratios or rankings.
How the bills are spread
21 of 51 jurisdictions sit above the national average of $142.26 and 30 below it. The national figure is a customer-weighted mean, not a mean of the states, so it sits where the population is, which is why fewer states are above it than a simple midpoint would suggest.
The dispersion is modest by the standards of anything else in this data library. The coefficient of variation across the states is 18% for the bill, against 37% for price and 24% for consumption. Household solar penetration, by comparison, varies by four orders of magnitude between first and last. Electricity bills are one of the most geographically uniform household costs in America.
That uniformity is worth holding onto when reading claims about a state being an expensive or a cheap place to run a home. The distance from the highest bill in the country to the lowest is $119.24 a month. It is a real difference and it compounds over a year to $1,430, but it is not the order-of-magnitude gap the rate tables imply.
The states where the rate table and the bill table disagree
Each state holds two ranks in this dataset: one for what it charges per kilowatt-hour and one for what its households actually pay a month. For most states the two are close. For the twelve below they are not, and every one of them is a state whose electricity costs are routinely described the wrong way round.
| State | Price rank | Bill rank | Movement | Price | Consumption | Monthly bill |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | 48 | 22 | +26 places | 11.73¢ | 14,422 kWh | $140.96 |
| Mississippi | 37 | 11 | +26 places | 13.39¢ | 13,871 kWh | $154.83 |
| Florida | 33 | 10 | +23 places | 14.14¢ | 13,250 kWh | $156.09 |
| Georgia | 35 | 13 | +22 places | 14.08¢ | 12,888 kWh | $151.25 |
| Tennessee | 43 | 21 | +22 places | 12.42¢ | 13,843 kWh | $143.32 |
| Alabama | 21 | 3 | +18 places | 15.18¢ | 13,718 kWh | $173.50 |
| Wisconsin | 16 | 42 | -26 places | 17.18¢ | 7,742 kWh | $110.87 |
| Illinois | 19 | 45 | -26 places | 15.87¢ | 8,317 kWh | $109.99 |
| Vermont | 10 | 35 | -25 places | 21.90¢ | 6,884 kWh | $125.66 |
| Michigan | 12 | 37 | -25 places | 19.30¢ | 7,419 kWh | $119.31 |
| District of Columbia | 15 | 40 | -25 places | 17.71¢ | 7,672 kWh | $113.23 |
| Minnesota | 20 | 44 | -24 places | 15.45¢ | 8,548 kWh | $110.06 |
HyreSolar analysis of EIA-861 2024. Both ranks run 1 = highest. A positive movement means the state pays more per month than its position on the rate table implies.
Louisiana and Mississippi move 26 places each: the largest divergence in the country in both cases, and in the same direction. Wisconsin moves the other way by 26.
The compression, as a table
Sort every jurisdiction by price and split into quarters. If the bill followed the rate, the last column would spread as widely as the second. It does not.
| Price group | Jurisdictions | Mean price | Mean consumption | Mean monthly bill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest quarter | 13 | 12.17¢ | 11,905 kWh | $120.64 |
| Second quarter | 13 | 14.11¢ | 11,679 kWh | $137.26 |
| Third quarter | 13 | 16.12¢ | 10,211 kWh | $136.40 |
| Dearest quarter | 12 | 26.59¢ | 7,002 kWh | $153.07 |
HyreSolar analysis of EIA-861 2024. Unweighted means within each quartile of jurisdictions sorted by residential price.
The dearest quarter of jurisdictions pays 2.19× the price of the cheapest quarter, but only 1.27× the bill, because it buys 41% less electricity to begin with.
What has moved over eleven years
The national residential price rose from 12.52¢/kWh in 2014 to 16.48¢ in 2024, a nominal increase of 32% over eleven years. These are nominal cents: no deflator is applied anywhere on this page, and over eleven years that matters a great deal to how the increase should be read.
The state paths are not parallel, and the sparklines below show why an aggregate is misleading. California's residential price went from 16.25¢ to 31.97¢: it very nearly doubled. Utah's moved from 10.65¢ to 12.22¢. Two states in the same interconnection, eleven years, entirely different experiences of what electricity costs.
We deliberately do not publish a bill series to match. EIA-861 lets us compute a per-account bill for each year, but a bill is a price times a quantity, and the quantity moves with weather. A single hot summer moves a state's average bill more than a tariff case does, and presenting an eleven-point bill series without weather normalisation would invite readers to see rate policy in what is mostly cooling degree days. The price series has no such problem, so that is the series we show.
What this figure will and will not do for you
Reasonable uses
Benchmarking a state against the country. The definition is identical in every jurisdiction and the source is a census, so cross-state comparison is exactly what this figure is for.
Sizing an aggregate. Multiply by residential accounts and you recover total residential revenue, which is where the number came from.
Sanity-checking a quote. If a sales estimate assumes your household spends far more than your state's average, ask which of the two terms it has inflated: the rate or the consumption. It is nearly always the second.
Understanding why solar payback differs by state. A solar array offsets kilowatt-hours at the marginal rate, not at the average bill. Two states with the same bill can have very different solar economics. Run your own numbers →
Uses it will not survive
"My bill should be this." It is a mean across every account in the state including flats, holiday homes and vacant properties. Most households pay less; some pay several times more.
Deriving a rate from it. Dividing this bill by an assumed consumption gives a number that is not the tariff, because the bill contains fixed charges that no per-kWh rate includes.
Estimating solar savings. Removing a state's average bill from a household's outgoings is the standard overstatement in solar sales copy. Fixed charges survive the array, exports are usually credited below retail, and the offset applies to the marginal rate. What exports are actually worth →
Reading a change over time as a policy outcome. Bills move with weather at least as much as with tariffs, and nothing here is weather-normalised.
Methodology
Source
US Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861, Sales to Ultimate Customers schedule, 2024 final release, with the 2014–2024 annual files behind the price series. Downloaded as the published ZIP archives on 2 September 2026. EIA-861 is a legally mandated annual census of US electric utilities, not a sample survey, so these figures carry no sampling error.
The 2024 file is the final release. EIA's 2025 early release is excluded from everything here: it covers a partial set of filers and would depress every state's revenue and customer count unevenly.
The arithmetic, in full
Monthly bill = residential revenue (thousand dollars) × 1,000 ÷ residential customers ÷ 12. Annual bill is the same without the final division. Price = residential revenue ÷ residential sales, expressed in cents per kilowatt-hour. Consumption = residential sales (MWh) × 1,000 ÷ residential customers.
All four are computed within each state from the same filers in the same year, never by apportioning a national total or by joining across vintages.
The identity check: price × consumption ÷ 12 reproduces the published monthly bill for every one of the 51 jurisdictions to within 5.3 cents, and the national figure to within 0.4 cents. That is not a validation of the data: it is a validation that the three published columns are internally consistent, which is what licenses the variance decomposition earlier on the page.
The double-counting trap, and the validation that catches it
EIA files service in restructured retail markets in two halves: Part B is a competitive supplier's energy sale, Part C is the incumbent utility's delivery of the same electricity to the same household. The two carry identical megawatthours. Summing sales and customers across every Part double-counts them and understates the 2024 national residential price by 1.12¢/kWh: an error large enough to reorder several states.
We sum revenue across all Parts, and sales and customers across Parts A, B and D only. That handling reproduces EIA's own published residential price series across all 357 overlapping state-years to within 0.005¢/kWh. EIA rounds its published series to two decimals, so the residual is rounding and nothing else. This is the strongest external check available on any figure in this library, and every bill and consumption figure on this page is built on the same extraction that passes it.
Definitions that change the answer
Customer, not household. The denominator is residential accounts. A master-metered building is one account for many homes. Where such stock is large (dense urban jurisdictions especially) the average bill is pulled upwards relative to what a family pays.
Mean, not median. Residential electricity consumption is right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median and more than half of households pay less than the figures here. EIA-861 publishes no distribution, so we cannot say by how much, and we will not guess.
Nominal dollars. No inflation adjustment is applied anywhere on this page, including in the eleven-year price series.
Bundled and unbundled service are combined. In restructured states a household's total cost is split across a supplier bill and a delivery bill. Our revenue figure sums both, which is the correct total but means the "price" for those states is a blended all-in figure rather than any single tariff a customer would recognise.
Limitations
No distribution, only a mean. This is the limitation that matters most to an individual reader, and no amount of analysis of this dataset will fix it. For the spread within a state you need utility rate-case data or the Residential Energy Consumption Survey, neither of which is what this page uses.
No weather normalisation. Consumption, and therefore the bill, reflects the actual weather of 2024. A hot summer raises a southern state's average bill without any tariff having changed.
No fuel split. A state where most homes heat with gas will show lower electricity consumption and a lower electricity bill while its households spend more on energy overall. Nothing here is a total household energy cost.
Annual resolution only. There are no monthly figures in this filing. A "monthly bill" here is one twelfth of an annual total, not what arrives in January, and in most states the seasonal swing around that twelfth is very large.
Reproducing this
Every figure above, including the correlations and the variance decomposition, is computed by script from the source workbooks into a single dataset file that the page reads. No number is typed into the prose. The inputs are a public federal download and the arithmetic is stated in this section; if you find an error, tell us and we will correct it here with a dated note.
Questions
What is the average electricity bill in the US?
Which state has the highest electricity bill?
Why is my bill higher than my state average?
Does a low electricity rate mean a low bill?
How is the average bill calculated here, exactly?
Is this the same as the average electricity rate by state?
Will solar eliminate my electricity bill?
Written and audited by
HyreSolar Research
Primary-source research, data analysis and fact checking
We are a research desk, not a sales floor. We read the statute, the tariff, the code section, the federal filing or the manufacturer data sheet ourselves, and we publish the figure with the document it came from and the date we retrieved it. Where a number cannot be traced to a primary source, we publish the shorter page and say what we could not verify. That rule has cost us whole sections, and it is the reason the rest can be trusted.
- 160
- primary sources read and cited
- 220
- figures with a retrieval date
- 115
- federal and state government sources
- 66
- researched pages published
How this desk works
- Primary sources only. Statutes from the legislature’s own publishing system, federal data from the agency that collects it, code text from the adopted edition, manufacturer claims from the data sheet. We do not cite an article that cites a source; we go and read the source.
- Every figure carries its provenance. A named document and the date we retrieved it, so you can check it and so you know how old it is. Retrieval dates are not decoration: an EIA rate from May is a different fact from an EIA rate from August.
- We publish what we could not verify. Every research page carries a section naming the things we tried to establish and could not, and why. A paywalled standard, a state website that refused the request, a manufacturer that publishes no figure at all.
- We separate measurement from modelling from our own reasoning, and label which is which on the page. A laboratory measurement, an assumption inside a modelling tool and our own inference are three different kinds of claim and they are never presented as one.
- We do not sell solar, and we take no payment for placement, ranking or a favourable mention. Nobody buys a position on this site.
Data as of EIA-861 2024 final release. Authorship on this site is organisational: the analysis belongs to the desk rather than to a named individual, and we do not publish credentials we do not hold. Our editorial policy sets out how we source, date and correct what we publish.
Sources & retrieval dates
- US EIA, Form EIA-861 — Net Metering (annual files, 2014–2024) — Utility-level net-metered installations, capacity and PV-paired batteries by state and customer sector. Retrieved 2 September 2026.
- US EIA, Form EIA-861 — Sales to Ultimate Customers (annual files, 2014–2024) — Residential revenue, sales and customer counts by utility and state. The basis for price, bill and consumption figures. Retrieved 2 September 2026.
- US EIA, Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector — EIA’s published price series, used to validate our derivation. Agreement across all 357 overlapping state-years is within 0.005¢/kWh. Retrieved 2 September 2026.
What would solar do to your bill, specifically?
A state average is $142.26 of context. The calculator takes your own consumption, your own tariff and your own roof, and separates the part an array can offset from the part it cannot.
HyreSolar is an independent analysis and matching service. We are not an installer, lender or utility. When a reader asks to be introduced, installers may pay us a referral fee. That fee never buys ranking, scores or placement in research. Our editorial policy sets out the rules.