The size of the fixed charge itself
Set by your utility and your tariff, not by you. Moving from $15 to $40 takes the untouchable share of the bill from 10.3% to 27.6% and the 25-year total from $4,500 to $12,000.
HyreSolar tools
The part of the bill that arrives whether you generate or not.
Every residential electricity bill has a floor. Before a single kilowatt-hour is counted, most utilities levy a fixed charge — a customer charge, a basic service charge, a meter charge — and solar does not reduce it by a cent. This tool works out how large yours is, what share of the bill it represents, and where your bill actually lands after solar.
What this returns at the defaults
On a $145 monthly bill covering 900 kWh with a $15 fixed charge, the fixed portion is 10.3% of the bill. A 90% offset of the variable half saves $117/mo and floors the bill at $28/mo — never zero. Raise the fixed charge to $40 and it becomes 27.6% of the bill and $12,000 over 25 years, an amount solar cannot touch no matter how large the array.
Last updated . Data as of 5 September 2026.
Three numbers off one electricity bill. No rate table involved.
Models the printed fixed charge only. Minimum bills and demand charges would raise your real floor.
Your own bill is the source. HyreSolar publishes no per-utility rate table and does not sell systems.
The number that matters is not the fixed charge, it is the share. Fifteen dollars is trivial against a $260 bill and substantial against an $80 one. This is the sense in which fixed charges are regressive: at our defaults the same $15 charge is 5.8% of a high user's bill and 18.8% of a low user's. The household with the least to spend gets the least protection from generating its own power.
Your bill after solar floors at the fixed charge, not at zero. Any proposal projecting a $0 bill is either ignoring the fixed charge, assuming credits that offset it, or wrong. Run 100% offset in the calculator and watch the floor stay put — that is the arithmetic, not a pessimistic assumption.
The variable rate is what solar actually competes against. Strip the fixed charge out and the remaining cents per kilowatt-hour is the rate your array is displacing. It is always lower than the blended rate, which is why a payback estimate built on the blended figure is slightly optimistic.
Every input below is a number you can find, not one you have to guess. This is where each one comes from.
It is a printed line, not something to estimate. Names vary: customer charge, basic service charge, service availability charge, meter charge, or basic charge.
Where to find it The itemised section of your electricity bill, usually near the top of the charges list and usually the same amount every month regardless of usage. That constancy is how you identify it if the naming is unclear.
The full amount due, including delivery, supply, taxes and riders. Not the supply line alone.
Where to find it The amount due box. Use a recent ordinary month rather than a seasonal peak or trough.
From the same bill as the amount. Mixing a bill total from one month with usage from another produces a meaningless rate.
Where to find it The usage section, usually shown as kWh this period alongside a comparison to last year.
The share of your consumption the array is designed to cover. This is a design figure from the proposal, not a guess.
Where to find it Your proposal, usually stated as an offset percentage or as annual production against annual usage. If it says 100%, note that this still does not zero the bill.
It is the answer to the question most homeowners actually have: what will my bill be after solar. The floor is where it lands in a month when the array covers everything it was designed to cover.
Where to find it Nowhere on your paperwork — this is the output. Compare it against any bill figure your proposal projects.
It puts the fixed charge in the same units as the system price. A charge that looks trivial monthly can be a meaningful fraction of what the array cost.
Where to find it Compare it against your installed price. At $40/month it is $12,000, which is a substantial share of a residential system.
Total minus the fixed charge is the variable portion. That split is the whole basis of the tool.
Blended rate is the whole bill over the whole kWh. Variable rate strips the fixed charge out first. Solar competes against the second.
Generating power reduces consumption charges. It does not reduce a charge levied for being connected.
What the bill lands at, and what the fixed charge alone costs across the system life.
The formula, in full
variable bill = total − fixed. blended rate = total ÷ kWh. variable rate = variable bill ÷ kWh. monthly saving = variable bill × offset. bill floor = total − monthly saving. lifetime fixed = fixed × 12 × years.
An ordinary residential account: $145 a month covering 900 kWh, carrying a $15 basic service charge, with a solar proposal designed for a 90% offset.
Inputs
Result
$28/mo floor, $4,500 fixed over 25 years
The array reaches $117 of a $145 bill. The remaining $28 is the $15 fixed charge plus the 10% of consumption the design does not cover. Note the two rates: a payback model using the 16.11¢ blended rate assumes the array displaces electricity at that price, but it can only displace the 14.44¢ variable rate — about 10% less value per kilowatt-hour than the blended figure implies. Over 25 years the fixed charge alone is $4,500.
The same $145 / 900 kWh account, one input changed at a time. Every figure is computed by the calculator on this page.
| Change | Fixed share | Blended rate | Variable rate | Monthly saving | Bill floor | 25-yr fixed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case$15 fixed, $145 bill, 900 kWh, 90% offset | 10.3% | 16.11¢ | 14.44¢ | $117/mo | $28/mo | $4,500 |
| No fixed charge at all | 0.0% | 16.11¢ | 16.11¢ | $131/mo | $15/mo | $0 |
| $25 fixed charge | 17.2% | 16.11¢ | 13.33¢ | $108/mo | $37/mo | $7,500 |
| $40 fixed charge | 27.6% | 16.11¢ | 11.67¢ | $95/mo | $51/mo | $12,000 |
| 100% offset instead of 90% | 10.3% | 16.11¢ | 14.44¢ | $130/mo | $15/mo | $4,500 |
| 70% offset instead of 90% | 10.3% | 16.11¢ | 14.44¢ | $91/mo | $54/mo | $4,500 |
| Low user: 400 kWh, $80 bill | 18.8% | 20.00¢ | 16.25¢ | $59/mo | $22/mo | $4,500 |
| High user: 1,800 kWh, $260 bill | 5.8% | 14.44¢ | 13.61¢ | $221/mo | $40/mo | $4,500 |
Two rows carry the argument. The 100% offset row still floors at $15/mo — the fixed charge survives a design that covers every kilowatt-hour the house uses. And the last two rows show the same $15 charge landing as 18.8% of a low user’s bill and 5.8% of a high user’s: an identical charge, nearly triple the burden, falling hardest on the household with the smallest bill.
Ranked. A proposal can change any of these without saying anything untrue, so these are the inputs to check first.
Set by your utility and your tariff, not by you. Moving from $15 to $40 takes the untouchable share of the bill from 10.3% to 27.6% and the 25-year total from $4,500 to $12,000.
The other half of the share calculation, and the reason the same charge is regressive. A fixed charge is a larger fraction of a small bill by construction.
Many utilities offer more than one residential rate, and they do not always weight fixed and volumetric charges the same way. This is worth asking about before sizing an array, not after.
Changes the saving but never the floor. This is the point most often misunderstood — a bigger array reduces the variable half toward zero and leaves the fixed charge exactly where it was.
Minimum bills, demand charges, non-bypassable charges, net metering successor tariff fees, standby charges, and taxes calculated on the total. Several of these behave like fixed charges and would raise your real floor further. This tool models the printed fixed charge only.
Unless your utility has no fixed charge, or credits exceed it, the bill cannot reach zero. Run 100% offset above and watch the floor hold at the fixed charge. If a proposal shows $0, ask what happened to the customer charge.
The blended rate includes money the array cannot displace. It overstates the value of each generated kilowatt-hour, modestly but systematically. The variable rate is the honest input.
They are different. Delivery is largely volumetric and solar does reduce it — our own measurement puts delivery at 53.2% of the residential bill. The fixed charge is the flat line that does not move with usage at all.
The fixed charge is the same every month, but the share it represents swings with usage. Take an ordinary month, or better, run a summer and a winter bill and look at both.
Utilities file to change fixed charges, and the direction of travel in many jurisdictions has been upward. A charge modelled at today’s level over 25 years is a floor on the estimate, not a ceiling.
The fixed charge is unaffected by array size in either direction. It is a reason to adjust expectations about the final bill, not a reason to change the design.
A flat monthly amount charged for being connected to the grid, independent of how much electricity you use. It appears under names like customer charge, basic service charge, service availability charge or meter charge. The reliable way to identify it is that it is the same every month while your usage changes.
No. Solar reduces consumption, and a fixed charge is not levied on consumption. This is why a bill after solar floors at the fixed charge rather than at zero — and why a proposal projecting a $0 bill has either omitted it or is assuming credits large enough to swallow it.
Because a credible per-utility table requires the OpenEI Utility Rate Database, which needs an API key we do not hold, and we will not ship a rate table we cannot retrieve or re-verify. This site already applies that rule to state electricity rates, where only figures with a named EIA vintage are published. Your own bill carries the number, printed, every month, and it is more current than any table we could build.
Look for the charge that is identical on two consecutive bills with different usage. That constancy identifies it regardless of the name. If every line moves with usage, your tariff may genuinely have no fixed charge — enter zero and the tool will tell you your bill can, in principle, approach zero.
As a share of the bill, arithmetically yes. Our scenario table holds the charge at $15 and changes only usage: it lands as 18.8% of a 400 kWh household’s bill and 5.8% of an 1,800 kWh household’s. That is a statement about the arithmetic of a flat fee, not a claim about any utility’s intent, and the policy arguments on both sides sit outside what this tool can settle.
The variable rate, if you want a strict answer. The blended rate includes money the array cannot displace, so it credits each generated kilowatt-hour with slightly more value than it earns. At our defaults the difference is 16.11¢ against 14.44¢ — about 10%, which is enough to matter across 25 years.
Only by going genuinely off-grid, which is a different project with different economics, different equipment and different risks. For a grid-tied system the charge is the price of the connection you are still using at night and in winter. See off-grid versus grid-tied.
It can, through a rate case at your regulator. We are not going to predict yours, and the 25-year total above deliberately holds it flat — which makes that figure a floor rather than a forecast. If your utility has a pending rate filing, the fixed charge is one of the lines worth reading.
No more than the array does. A battery raises self-consumption, which reduces the variable half further, but the fixed charge is untouched by both. If a battery proposal projects a lower bill than the array alone, check that the difference is coming from consumption and not from an assumption about the fixed charge.
Every assumption in this calculator is argued from primary sources somewhere in our research library. These are the pages that matter for this one.
Screens whether rooftop or community solar fits your roof, shade, timeline and capital. Every weight published.
Severe hail and wind exposure by state from 36,261 measured NOAA reports, normalised by land area.
Places you in the interconnection sequence, names who is actually holding it, and says whether the wait has become unusual.
Actual results depend on roof, usage, utility rules and a real proposal. Matching is still being built. The form is an enquiry, not a dispatch line.
Written and audited by
Primary-source research, data analysis and fact checking
We are a research desk, not a sales floor. We read the statute, the tariff, the code section, the federal filing or the manufacturer data sheet ourselves, and we publish the figure with the document it came from and the date we retrieved it. Where a number cannot be traced to a primary source, we publish the shorter page and say what we could not verify. That rule has cost us whole sections, and it is the reason the rest can be trusted.
How this desk works
Data as of 5 September 2026. Authorship on this site is organisational: the analysis belongs to the desk rather than to a named individual, and we do not publish credentials we do not hold. Our editorial policy sets out how we source, date and correct what we publish.