HyreSolar

Research in progress

Solar lease contract terms study

Part one: how much of the market now signs a lease or PPA. Part two, the contract teardown, is being collected.

Updated October 2026 · Data as of DG Stats file dated 31 August 2026

52% of new SCE systems third-party owned, 2025 29% in 2023
41% of new PG&E systems, 2025 22% in 2023

Status

Solar Lease Contract Terms Study is an original HyreSolar dataset built from named public sources, with the method and a downloadable file.

Leases and PPAs are back: 52% of new residential systems at SCE and 41% at PG&E were third-party owned in 2025, up from 29% and 22% in 2023.

More households are therefore signing 20- to 25-year contracts whose escalators and buyout terms they rarely compare.

The contract-terms half of this study needs a sample of executed agreements; no public dataset of them exists. Until we have collected and coded at least 50, this page reports only the market-share half and makes no claim about typical escalator rates.

The return of the lease

Share of new residential solar that is leased or on a PPA, by utility02040602016201720182019202020212022202320242025% third-party ownedPG&ESCESDG&E
Share of new residential PV systems that are third-party owned, by approval year. HyreSolar calculation from California DG Stats Interconnected Project Sites (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E), retrieved 22 October 2026.

Third-party ownership fell steadily through 2023 as loans and cash purchases took over. The Net Billing Tariff reversed that: with exports worth less, the economics favored bundling a battery, raising upfront cost, and lease and PPA providers could still claim the commercial 48E credit that households lost when 25D ended on 31 December 2025.

Third-party-owned share by utility and year

YearPG&ESCESDG&E
201645.3%52.7%29.5%
201729.5%41.6%22.4%
201828.2%41.2%20.9%
201928.8%43.5%25.7%
202028.5%39.9%31.1%
202123.9%34.8%23.8%
202222.5%29.7%21.1%
202321.7%29.2%20.1%
202439.2%48.7%38.6%
202541.4%51.6%36.0%

Field “Third Party Owned” on each interconnection record. HyreSolar calculation from California DG Stats Interconnected Project Sites (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E), retrieved 22 October 2026.

Method and what is still missing

Market share (published)

Residential PV rows in the DG Stats Interconnected Project Sites file, grouped by approval year; share with Third Party Owned = Yes.

Contract terms (not yet published)

Planned: escalator rate, term, buyout schedule, transfer and removal clauses, coded from executed lease and PPA contracts that homeowners share with identifying details removed. Minimum sample before publication: 50 contracts from at least 5 providers. Until then, use the escalator calculator on your own contract.

Embed this finding

Paste this snippet into any page or CMS that accepts HTML. It carries the figure, the underlying source and a link back to the method, so the number travels with its conditions.

<figure style="border:1px solid #ddd;padding:12px;margin:0;font:15px/1.5 system-ui,sans-serif">
  <p style="margin:0 0 6px"><strong>52% of new residential solar at SCE and 41% at PG&E was leased or on a PPA in 2025.</strong></p>
  <figcaption style="font-size:13px;color:#555">Source: <a href="https://hyresolar.com/research/tpo-contract-teardown/">HyreSolar, Solar lease market share, California</a> (California DG Stats Interconnected Project Sites (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E), retrieved 22 October 2026).</figcaption>
</figure>

Charts on this page may be reproduced with the same attribution. The rows behind them are in interconnection-timelines.csv.

Citation, reuse and corrections

How to cite this study

Full citation. HyreSolar Research, “Solar lease contract terms study (part one: market share)”, October 2026. Analysis of California DG Stats Interconnected Project Sites (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E), retrieved 22 October 2026. Available at https://hyresolar.com/research/tpo-contract-teardown/

In a chart or table. “Source: HyreSolar analysis of California DG Stats interconnection data (2026)”.

Reproducing it

Download the zip from the DG Stats downloads page, then run docs/research-data/cadgstats/extract_cadg.py from this site’s repository. The summary rows are in interconnection-timelines.csv. The raw file (1.3 GB unzipped) is not mirrored here.

What you may reuse

The source file is public. Our derived medians, charts and tables may be reproduced with attribution and a link to this page (CC BY 4.0).

Corrections and updates

Errors are corrected on the page with a dated note. DG Stats refreshes its file monthly; we rebuild this study at least annually at the same URL.

Written and audited by

HyreSolar Research

Primary-source research, data analysis and fact checking

We are a research desk, not a sales floor. We read the statute, the tariff, the code section, the federal filing or the manufacturer data sheet ourselves, and we publish the figure with the document it came from and the date we retrieved it.

Where a number cannot be traced to a primary source, we publish the shorter page and say what we could not verify. That rule has cost us whole sections, and it is why the rest can be checked.

160
primary sources read and cited
228
figures with a retrieval date
115
federal and state government sources
66
researched pages published

How this desk works

  • Primary sources only. Statutes from the legislature’s own publishing system, federal data from the agency that collects it, code text from the adopted edition, manufacturer claims from the data sheet. We do not cite an article that cites a source; we go and read the source.
  • Every figure carries its provenance. A named document and the date we retrieved it, so you can check it and so you know how old it is. Retrieval dates are not decoration: an EIA rate from May is a different fact from an EIA rate from August.
  • We publish what we could not verify. Every research page carries a section naming the things we tried to establish and could not, and why. A paywalled standard, a state website that refused the request, a manufacturer that publishes no figure at all.
  • We separate measurement from modeling from our own reasoning, and label which is which on the page. A laboratory measurement, an assumption inside a modeling tool and our own inference are three different kinds of claim and they are never presented as one.
  • We do not sell solar, and we take no payment for placement, ranking or a favorable mention. Nobody buys a position on this site.

Data as of DG Stats file dated 31 August 2026. Authorship on this site is organizational: the analysis belongs to the desk rather than to a named individual, and we do not publish credentials we do not hold. Our editorial policy sets out how we source, date and correct what we publish.

The data behind this page

Every figure on this page is computed from one file, and that file is published here so the analysis can be checked, disagreed with, or reused.

Download the dataset (CSV)

Sources & retrieval dates

California DG Stats — Interconnected Project Sites (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E), file dated 31 August 2026, Every customer-sited generator interconnected by California’s three investor-owned utilities under NEM and Rule 21, one row per project, with application received and approved dates, system size, reported total system cost, ownership, storage and tariff. 2,041,152 residential photovoltaic rows after de-duplication. Retrieved 22 October 2026.

Weighing a lease against buying?

Run both against your bill before you sign.

Lease vs buy Solar lease costs

HyreSolar is an independent analysis and matching service. We are not an installer, lender or utility. When a reader asks to be introduced, installers may pay us a referral fee. That fee never buys ranking, scores or placement in research. Our editorial policy sets out the rules.